Compare: Constant Contact vs Loops

A side-by-side analysis to help you find the right tool.

Constant Contact

Paid(Under $50/mo)

Yes (60-day free trial)

Freemium(Under $50/mo)

Free tier (1,000 contacts)

Pricing Model

Constant ContactPaid

LoopsFreemium

Free Trial

Constant ContactYes (60-day free trial)

LoopsFree tier (1,000 contacts)

Business Type Fit

Constant ContactB2B, B2C

LoopsB2B

Best For

Constant ContactVery small businesses and nonprofits wanting simplicity

LoopsModern SaaS startups wanting a developer-friendly, clean email platform

Pros

Constant Contact

Extended trial period allows ample time for thorough platform evaluation.
Built in event marketing functionality simplifies webinar and gathering management.
Accessible telephone customer assistance helps non technical users resolve issues quickly.

Loops

Delivers a contemporary user experience that feels native to modern software teams.
Consolidates transactional and marketing communications into one platform.
Features a robust application programming interface designed for rapid developer integration.
Exhibits rapid momentum and frequent product enhancements.

Cons

Constant Contact

Workflow automation capabilities are overly simplistic for advanced scaling needs.
User interface and feature ecosystem feel legacy compared to newer competitors.
Data segmentation options restrict targeted messaging campaigns.

Loops

Operates as an early stage organization with a narrower feature breadth than legacy market leaders.
Offers fewer native integrations compared to established enterprise alternatives.
Carries inherent startup longevity risks due to a smaller operating team.